Average competitor results. Comparison of our solution with Ananas.rs. Learn more about our technology.

Technical Specifications

Website performance is the result of multiple factors.

In fact, it would be impossible to cover all aspects of optimization in a single massive book. Some of the most important factors include:

• Image Optimization (Format, Size, Processing, Discovery, and Grouping).
• Server Responsiveness and Availability.
• Elimination of Blocking Resources.
• Search Speed.
• Data Caching at Different Levels.
• Controlled Execution of Third-Party Scripts.
• File Compression for Security and Size Optimization.
• DOM and CSS Selector Optimization.
• Prevent Memory Leaks.

What is oozmi?

Each of these items requires careful planning and many resources. To speed up the process, oozmi has developed a unique technology that generates websites for different clients, while the core system is developed only once, optimized for all.

Read here about how we generate websites and reduce the costs of implementing new features:

How we generate websites

How generating websites provides a no-compromise product while reducing development and maintenance costs. (read the full article)

How does oozmi differ from the competition?

oozmi achieves outstanding results, even when compared to the most expensively developed online stores. The difference lies in several key advantages:

These advantages allow our system to achieve performance levels that are almost unattainable by the competition.

Competitive solutions

To showcase the performance difference, we divided the competitors into three groups:

How do we measure performance?

Since there are many factors that affect the user experience, there is no "one right" way to measure overall performance. Each website is a story made up of many chapters that must be measured individually to get the overall performance rating. For a detailed analysis, please contact: contact@oozmi.com.

The most commonly used tool for measuring performance is Lighthouse (https://pagespeed.web.dev). It is one of the best tools for measuring the initial performance of a website (which is just one part of the puzzle). Since Google uses it for ranking websites, a large portion of the performance will be shown as a result of this tool.

Poor performance - Fashion&Friends

For the average example of a large website in our market, we take Fashion&Friends. Like many websites on the Serbian market, "initial performance" (measured by Lighthouse) is just one of the issues they face. The tool results are:

Average performance - DexyCo

For an example of an expensive website, we take DexyCo. At first glance, these websites do not show drastically better performance, but even small improvements can have a significant impact on sales.

A detailed analysis reveals a major issue with database responsiveness during product list loading and search with multiple concurrent users.

Good performance - Ananas.rs

Ananas.rs is an example of a website optimized according to the latest standards, without limitations on development cost. This is the maximum that can be achieved without using advanced technological solutions like those offered by oozmi.

Ananas.rs vs. oozmi

In early 2024, we conducted a study comparing the performance difference between the Ananas.rs website and an identical website using oozmi technology, with the same design and functionalities. The results showed significant improvements in performance brought by oozmi technology.

In 95% of cases, user interaction was accurately predicted by our system, which significantly accelerated the loading of new pages.

In the remaining 5% of cases where predictions were not accurate, the Oozmi system reduced page load speed by 20%.

65%

reduced initial data load.

75%

reduced loading time on mobile phones.

92%

faster loading on desktop devices.